Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: SOUTH/SOUTH EAST/ COASTAL OUTER BANKS
Thanked 470 Times in 244 Posts
||LinkBack||Thread Tools||Display Modes|
“J.P. Morgan Chase Co. expects U.S. home prices to rise 3.4% in its base-case estimate and up to 9.7% in its most bullish scenario of economic growth. Standard and Poor’s, which rates private-issue mortgage bonds, on Friday said it expects a 5% rise in 2013.” (“Home Prices Could Jump 9.7% in 2013, J.P. Morgan Says”, Wall Street Journal)And the housing boom is having an impact on Wall Street, too, where prescient investors who loaded up on mortgage-backed securities (MBS) are cashing in bigtime via the Fed’s new MBS-buying program dubbed QE3. Fed chairman Ben Bernanke is paying top-dollar for financial derivatives that, in real terms, are probably worth just pennies on the dollar.
“Some readers have been asking how one can reconcile positive signs in the housing market with declining rates of homeownership. Indeed, homeownership is falling at an even faster pace than during the 08-10 period….The explanation is that so far a great deal of net demand growth in housing has been in rental units. …This demand for rentals is in fact one of the factors supporting the housing market – for every renter there is a landlord who buys a home.Well, that changes things a bit, doesn’t it? So if the number of people who actually bought a home and moved in dropped by 175,000, then what we’re seeing is industrial-scale investment by Wall Street speculators who are getting lavish financing perks from the banks to buy distressed properties that, if they had been sold on the MLS or via bank auctions, would have driven prices down even further pushing bank balance sheets deeper into the red. In other words, the Obama administration, the banks, the Fed and the behemoth private equity firms are all in bed together to prevent firsttime homebuyers from getting a good deal on a foreclosure and to reward the people who blew up the financial system with another backdoor bailout.
JPMorgan: – There is no contradiction between increased demand for housing and reduced homeownership rates. Demand for housing is mainly dependent on the increase in the number of households, whether these households choose to own or to rent the housing units they live in. Growth of household formation had been stifled during the expansion to date by high unemployment and subdued job growth.
The decline in homeownership rates implies that virtually all the increase in demand for housing units associated with increased household formation consists of increased demand for rental units. Indeed current estimates indicate that over the past year the number of occupied rental units increased 1.32 million and the number of owneroccupied housing units actually declined 175,000.” (“Falling homeownership rate and the housing market”, Sober Look)
“Current homeowners are finally moving up, and distressed sales are making up less of the overall market—all signs of much-needed improvement in housing….Unfortunately, first-time home buyers are seeing just the opposite, largely left out of this surge in sales and prices. Their share of the market, usually up in the 40 percent range historically, fell to 34.7 percent in October, the lowest in the Campbell/IMF survey’s three-year history.” (“Housing Recovery Is Leaving Behind First-Time Buyers”, CNBC)So, more of the low-end homes are being bought up by the big private equity firms, which means fewer crumbs for the little guy at the bottom. Is that really a positive development?
“The October numbers were driven entirely by multifamily apartment starts, up 10 percent month-to-month and up 63 percent year over year…..Younger Americans are in fact moving out of their parents’ basements, but many are moving into rental units, and that is also a formed household.” (“Yes, Housing Starts Surge, but Rentals Are the Drivers”, CNBC)So this is the great housing recovery that everyone’s been crowing about; little Johnny and Janie finally leave the nest to live in a rental unit owned by some fatcat PE pirate from Manhattan? That doesn’t exactly sound like the America Dream, now does it? And here’s something else to mull over (from the same article):
“Housing starts at 894,000 is near where they were at the depths of the 1981 and 1991 recessions and 60 percent below the peak in January 2006,” pointed out Peter Boockvar at Miller Tabak.”So let’s keep things in perspective. Housing is still in the doldrums despite the hype, despite the low rates, despite the unprecedented meddling and intervention by the Fed, the banks and the USG. Just look at the data. Naturally, if the banks withhold distressed inventory, the government lends money to underwater homeowners, and the Fed slashes rates to record lows and buys whatever MBS the banks produce, then there’s going to be a surge in activity. But how long will it last?
“There is a tsunami of money coming into the market, billions of dollars to buy distressed single-family homes,” said Jeff Lerman, a San Rafael real estate lawyer, speaking about the national landscape. “The window of opportunity is rapidly closing (as prices rise). Over the next 18 months, profit margins in single-family opportunistic buying will be compressed quite a bit.”
A Chronicle analysis of sales data compiled by San Diego research firm DataQuick showed that absentee buyers, who once bought about 10 percent of homes sold in the nine Bay Area counties, account for about a quarter of all purchases this year, more than doubling their share…..Repeat: “A tsunami of money coming into the market” from deep-pocket speculators. That’s your “recovery” in a nutshell.
“Right now the dominating force driving the rental market in California is foreclosed-upon former homeowners transitioning to renters,” Burke said. “That demographic is an important market segment for us.” (“Investors rushing into real estate deals”, SF Gate)
“For years I have proclaimed that “no housing recovery will ever occur — or no dead-cat-bounce will reach “escape velocity” or become “durable” — unless the repeat buyer is leading the way. This is because investors and first-timers are thin, volatile cohorts who have been known over history to leave the market literally, overnight….Hanson makes a good point. Traditionally, repeat “move up” buyers have driven the market, but that’s not happening now because so many people are underwater and can’t afford to move. So, yes, housing prices can go higher for a while, but the higher they go, the less profit investors will make, which will lead to a drop-off in sales and greater price erosion. That will put us back at Square 1.
The problem is that the mortgaged homeowner has always been the primary demand cohort. It’s not investors, first-timers or those who own their homes free and clear. Rather, the mortgage-levered homeowner who tends to move every 6 to 8 years who provides most of the historic underlying support for macro housing.
This is a problem. Put simply, there are more houses today then there were five years ago but a full HALF of the primary demand cohort — repeat buyers — died due to negative equity….. and able buyers have been cut in half.
Bottom line, WHERE IS THE “DURABLE”, INCREMENTAL DEMAND GOING TO COME FROM(?) (“Shadow” & “Ghost” Inventory / Negative & “Effective” Negative Equity…The Real Challenges for US Housing”, Mark Hanson, The Big Picture)
“The good news is that overall foreclosure activity continues to fall and a decline in new foreclosures are leading the drop. The bad news is that the huge backlog of homes already in the foreclosures process, but long delayed, are finally going back to the banks in big numbers.So tell me this, dear reader: Why did “bank repossessions (suddenly) jump 11% in November”? And why has foreclosure activity picked up for the first time “in over two years”?
Bank repossessions jumped 11% in November month-to-month and rose 5% from November of 2011, according to RealtyTrac. That marks the first annual jump in just over two years.” (“Housing’s Repo Man Is Back”, CNBC)
“Federal Reserve Chairman Ben S. Bernanke said the Fed will take action to speed growth and a rebound in a housing market facing obstacles ranging from too-tight lending rules to racial discrimination….Bernanke said while tighter credit standards after a collapse in the subprime mortgage market were appropriate, “it seems likely at this point that the pendulum has swung too far the other way, and that overly tight lending standards may now be preventing creditworthy borrowers from buying homes, thereby slowing the revival in housing and impeding the economic recovery.”…Did you catch that part about how “the Fed will take action (on) racial discrimination”?
Bernanke said housing-finance authorities have taken steps to “remove barriers to the flow of mortgage credit” and referred to efforts by the Federal Housing Finance Agency and by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to clarify rules surrounding mortgages that go into default.
These steps, the 58-year-old Fed chief said, should “increase the willingness of lenders to make new loans.” (“Bernanke Says Fed Will Do What It Can to Support Housing”, Bloomberg)
“Lenders were 3½ times more likely to steer blacks to high-interest mortgages than whites with comparable credit scores, according to a Center for Responsible Lending study of 27 million loans originated from 2004 to 2008. In Memphis, where 63 percent of the 652,000 residents are black, officials say their city was targeted for such predatory lending — a practice that Marano says his company didn’t engage in….”(“Wall Street Kept Winning on Mortgages Upending Homeowners”, Bloomberg)Does Bernanke really care if minorities get fleeced for a second time in less than a decade?